Docker image for our benchmark setup providing IOGA
2.6K
10 check points from Weber et al. "Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking" (2018) arXiv
automatic assembly tools extracting whole chloroplast genomes from mixed (plastid+genome) sequencing data
GetOrganelle, fast-plast, org-asm, NOVOPlasty, chloroExtractor, IOGA TODO: is there another one we are missing?
We plan to use simulated data (at different chloro:genome ratios) and real datasets with existing reference chloroplasts TODO: select exact list of chloros TODO: produce simulated datasets
Latest version of each (wrapped into a docker container), default parameters as possible TODO: update all docker containers TODO: select default parameters for each tool
We currently only have qualitative metrics (success, failure, incomplete, ...) TODO: design quantitative metrics (reference guided: completeness, continuity, correctness) TODO: write script to gather these metrics from output
we have a script to track all performence metrics with docker TODO: separate performence benchmarking runs with docker TODO: find objective (as objective as possible) measures for requirements, user-friendliness, code quality and documentation TODO: assign these metrics to all tools
in addition to pure metrics keep an eye on complementarity, maybe recommend ensemble methods TODO
GitHub, zenodo, DockerHub, biorXiv, BMC TODO
We have that with the docker setup and having scripted everything TODO: documentation on GitHub on how to reproduce the benchmarking (incl. extension)
Already covered with all previous points
Content type
Image
Digest
Size
701.3 MB
Last updated
about 7 years ago
docker pull chloroextractorteam/benchmark_ioga