Sign inSign up

credkellar/lte-6g

By credkellar

โ€ขUpdated about 15 hours ago

LTE to 6G converter: Shannon + FSPL model, QCI-to-slice map, sandbox chamber, HoneypotX, AI council.

Image
Networking
Security
Machine learning & AI
1

46

credkellar/lte-6g repository overview

LTE-6G cover

โ ๐Ÿ“กโšก LTE-6G โ€” LTE to 6G Internet Converter

๐ŸŒ A converter that takes an LTE (4G) cell in one end and produces its 6G conversion out the other โ€” the link model recomputed on real Shannon + path-loss physics, every QCI bearer mapped into 6G slices LTE never had, and a KEEP / UPGRADE / NEW / HOLD plan for the real-world build โ€” guarded by a sandbox-api chamber, HoneypotX, and a Carbon 4 + Muse council.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป By Darion Kellar ยท ๐Ÿ“œ MIT License ยท ๐Ÿ Python stdlib only, zero dependencies ยท ๐Ÿท๏ธ v1.0.0

Python License Dependencies LTE 6G Model Tests Checks HOLD Gates Docker

โš ๏ธ Honest scope, up front: this converter is a model, mapper and planner. Software alone does not convert a physical LTE radio into a 6G radio โ€” 6G is not commercially deployed, and a real conversion needs new spectrum licences, new sub-THz radios and new antennas. Every capacity in this README is modelled, not measured, and the code says so in every report (physical_conversion_by_software_alone: false, modelled_not_measured: true).

๐Ÿณ Docker Hub status: credkellar/lte-6g is not yet published - the image appears after the owner's workflow paste + Docker Hub secrets (see Updated Workflows). Until then, run it from source or build the included Dockerfile locally. Every number below is from the verified v1.0.0 build (pytest 12 passed, CHECKS 27/27).


โ ๐Ÿ”„ Updated Workflows

Two workflows ship in workflow-pack/ and are pasted by the repo owner into .github/workflows/ (plural โ€” GitHub Actions only reads that exact folder; the GitHub App cannot write workflow files, so this step is the owner's):

CI Docker Publish

โ„น๏ธ The badges above are static "pending" badges on purpose: the real ci.yml / docker-publish.yml badge URLs return 404 until the workflows are pasted and run once (checked live 2026-11-10). They are not claimed green.

โ–ถ๏ธ ci.yml โ€” on push / pull request / manual dispatch: Python 3.12 โ†’ pytest tests/ -q โ†’ python main.py checks โ†’ demo smoke test. ๐Ÿณ docker-publish.yml โ€” on push to main / manual dispatch: Docker Hub login with the DOCKERHUB_USERNAME / DOCKERHUB_TOKEN repo secrets โ†’ build & push credkellar/lte-6g:latest.


โ ๐Ÿงฐ Tech Stack Badges

๐Ÿ’ป Core: Python 3.12 ยท Shannon + FSPL link model ยท zero dependencies ๐Ÿ“ก Radio: LTE (4G) โ†’ 6G modelled ยท slices eMBB+ / URLLC++ / mMTC+ / Q-SLICE ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Security: sandbox-api chamber ยท HoneypotX ยท 14 HOLD gates ๐Ÿง  AI Council: Gemini Carbon 4 Extended Thinking (DECIDER) ยท Muse (advisor, authority none) โš™๏ธ DevOps: Docker ยท GitHub Actions CI (pending owner's workflow paste) ๐Ÿ“œ Project: MIT License ยท Tests 12 passed ยท Checks 27/27 ยท Status: Simulation

Web3: honestly none - this is a radio-network converter, not a chain project.


โ ๐Ÿ“– What is this about?

๐Ÿ“ถ Almost every mobile network on Earth still runs on LTE (4G) โ€” one 20 MHz carrier at a time, no network slicing, QoS handled by old EPS bearers (QCI 1โ€“9), and a packet core (the EPC) designed in the 2000s. 6G is the next generation being designed now: aggregated sub-THz spectrum, 256-element arrays, network slices for every traffic class, and latency targets 100ร— tighter.

๐Ÿ”€ LTE-6G is about the jump between those two worlds. It answers, with working code instead of a slide deck: if you take THIS LTE cell โ€” this band, this carrier width, this many streams โ€” what does its 6G conversion actually look like? How much faster is the model? What happens to voice, video and IoT traffic that LTE carries on bearers? What can you keep, what must you upgrade, and what is brand new?

๐Ÿงฎ It uses the same link physics as Darion's Q6G-1TB project (Shannon capacity + free-space path loss), so the two projects' numbers are directly comparable โ€” a converted LTE cell lands right next to the Q6G-1TB link it feeds into.


โ โš™๏ธ What this does?

  1. ๐Ÿ“ฅ Takes an LTE profile in โ€” lte (Band 3, 1.8 GHz, one 20 MHz carrier, 2 streams, 64-QAM) or lte-advanced (Band 7, 2.6 GHz, 5-carrier aggregation = 100 MHz, 4 streams, 256-QAM).
  2. ๐Ÿงฎ Recomputes the link on the 6G model โ€” the LTE band stays as coverage anchor; the 60 / 140 / 300 GHz 6G layers (24 GHz) aggregate on top; streams scale to 8; the array becomes 256 elements; modulation cap rises to 4096-QAM; overhead drops 25% โ†’ 15%.
  3. ๐Ÿ“Š Reports the gain honestly โ€” capacity ร—, bandwidth ร—, latency before/after, plus a distance sweep (10 / 100 / 500 / 1000 m) because sub-THz fades fast.
  4. ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ Creates the slice layer LTE never had โ€” all 9 QCI bearer classes (voice, video, gaming, signalling, default dataโ€ฆ) are assigned to 6G slices: eMBB+, URLLC++, mMTC+, and the new Q-SLICE.
  5. ๐Ÿ“‹ Writes the real-world plan โ€” KEEP (fibre, SIM, anchor band, site) ยท UPGRADE (array, streams, eNodeB, EPC โ†’ 6G core) ยท NEW (slicing, sub-THz radios, spectrum licence, QKD keys) ยท HOLD (live cutover, live transmission).
  6. ๐Ÿงช Triages every conversion payload through the sandbox-api chamber โ€” copied verbatim from Darion's sandbox-api implementation; payloads are data only, never executed, network attempts always 0. Result on the built-in set: 7 payloads โ†’ 4 allowed / 3 held.
  7. ๐Ÿฏ Watches the doors with HoneypotX โ€” honeyroot-x style log analysis over synthetic trap logs for the converter's management surfaces: 12 attempts classified (scanner 4 ยท env harvest 3 ยท LFI 2 ยท SQLi 2 ยท upload 1), top threat 100, no listener ever opened, no access ever granted.
  8. ๐Ÿง  Runs the council โ€” Gemini Carbon 4 Extended Thinking decides (MAP โ†’ MODEL โ†’ STRESS โ†’ DECIDE, tiers 2048 / 8192 / 32768), Muse advises (exactly 4 items, authority none), strictest wins.
  9. โ›” Holds everything live โ€” 14 HOLD gates: live carrier conversion, live subscriber cutover, real RF transmission, firmware flashing, live HoneypotX listener, live sample detonation, and more.

๐Ÿ“ˆ The headline numbers (modelled @ 100 m, verified by the test suite):

ProfileLTEโ†’ 6G convertedCapacity gainLatency
lte0.18 Gbps1,608.49 Gbps (1.61 Tbps)ร—8,936.110.0003 ms โ†’ 0.0703 ms (ร—142.3)
lte-advanced2.50 Gbps1,570.35 Gbps (1.57 Tbps)ร—629.110.0003 ms โ†’ 0.0703 ms (ร—142.3)

โ ๐Ÿ”ฌ How this works?

flowchart TD
    A[๐Ÿ“ถ LTE profile<br/>lte / lte-advanced] --> B[๐Ÿงช sandbox-api chamber<br/>payload triage: data only, never executed]
    B -- allowed --> C[๐Ÿ”€ converter.convert_link<br/>anchor band + 60/140/300 GHz layers]
    B -- held --> X[โ›” HOLD_IN_CHAMBER]
    C --> D[๐Ÿงฎ link model<br/>Shannon + FSPL, both generations]
    C --> E[๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ slices: QCI 1-9 โ†’ eMBB+ / URLLC++ / mMTC+ / Q-SLICE]
    C --> F[๐Ÿ“‹ upgrade plan<br/>KEEP / UPGRADE / NEW / HOLD]
    D --> G[๐Ÿ“Š conversion report<br/>gain, sweep, honesty flags]
    E --> G
    F --> G
    H[๐Ÿฏ HoneypotX<br/>trap-log analysis, no listener] -. watches .-> B
    I[๐Ÿง  Council: Carbon 4 DECIDER + Muse advisor] -. judges .-> G
    G --> J{โ›” Live action?}
    J -- Yes --> K[๐Ÿ›‘ HOLD gate - Darion approves]
    J -- No, model only --> L[โœ… Report delivered]

Step by step:

  1. ๐ŸŽฏ You pick a profile (python main.py convert lte).
  2. ๐Ÿงช Its conversion payloads pass the sandbox-api chamber first โ€” a static marker scan (eval / exec / shell / socket markers โ†’ held). Nothing is ever executed.
  3. ๐Ÿ”€ The converter keeps the LTE band as the coverage anchor and aggregates the three 6G layers on top, scaling streams, antennas, modulation and overhead to the 6G rules.
  4. ๐Ÿงฎ The link model prices both sides with identical physics: capacity = bandwidth ร— Shannon efficiency(SNR) ร— streams ร— (1 โˆ’ overhead), with SNR from FSPL + beamforming gain.
  5. ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ The slice mapper assigns every QCI bearer class to a 6G slice โ€” creating a slice layer where LTE had none.
  6. ๐Ÿ“‹ The planner splits the real build into KEEP / UPGRADE / NEW / HOLD.
  7. ๐Ÿฏ HoneypotX classifies recorded probes against the converter's doors (log analysis only โ€” it never opens a port).
  8. ๐Ÿง  The council judges the request: Carbon 4 decides, Muse advises, strictest wins โ€” a live conversion request ends at HOLD.

โ ๐Ÿ˜Ž Why is this is cool?

โ ๐Ÿ† 10 reasons why this is cool
  1. โญ๏ธ It skips a whole generation โ€” most upgrade talk is LTE โ†’ 5G or 5G โ†’ 6G; this converter prices the direct LTE โ†’ 6G jump, two core generations in one plan.
  2. ๐Ÿงฎ Real physics, not typed numbers โ€” Shannon + FSPL compute every figure; change a band or a stream count and the answer changes for a physical reason.
  3. ๐ŸŽฏ The gain is enormous and it shows its work โ€” ร—8,936.1 modelled capacity for classic LTE, with the full distance sweep printed so you can watch sub-THz fade.
  4. ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ It invents the slice layer honestly โ€” LTE has no slices to rename, so the converter creates them from QCI classes and says exactly that.
  5. ๐Ÿ“‹ KEEP / UPGRADE / NEW / HOLD is a plan a builder can use โ€” fibre and SIMs carry over, THz radios and licences are called out as genuinely new, live cutover is held.
  6. ๐Ÿงช A detonation chamber guards the input โ€” the sandbox-api chamber (Darion's own, 8,463-pull Docker image lineage) triages every payload and never executes any of them.
  7. ๐Ÿฏ HoneypotX watches the doors โ€” probes against the converter's management pages are classified and scored from trap logs, with zero ports opened to do it.
  8. ๐Ÿง  Two AI brains, one rule โ€” Carbon 4 Extended Thinking decides with a visible MAP โ†’ MODEL โ†’ STRESS โ†’ DECIDE trace; Muse advises and can never override; strictest wins.
  9. ๐Ÿ”— It connects straight into Q6G-1TB โ€” same bands, same physics, same council: a converted cell's 1.61 Tbps modelled link is the Q6G-1TB link's sibling, not a stranger.
  10. ๐Ÿชถ Zero dependencies, one entry point โ€” pure Python stdlib, python main.py demo, runs anywhere Python 3.12 runs, including a phone terminal.

โ ๐Ÿงฉ What problems this solves?

โ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ 10 solutions
#๐Ÿ˜– Problemโœ… Solution in LTE-6G
1"How much faster would 6G actually be for OUR cell?" has no concrete answer๐Ÿ”€ Per-profile conversion reports with capacity / bandwidth / latency gains computed from that cell's own band, carrier and streams
2Vendor upgrade decks use peak numbers from different physics๐Ÿงฎ One identical Shannon + FSPL model prices both generations, so the comparison is apples-to-apples
3LTE QoS (QCI bearers) has no obvious 6G home๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ A complete QCI 1โ€“9 โ†’ slice map: voice & signalling โ†’ URLLC++, data & video โ†’ eMBB+, IoT โ†’ mMTC+
4People assume slicing is an LTE feature you can switch on๐Ÿ“ข The plan states LTE had no slicing and creates the layer as a NEW build item
5Upgrade plans hide what must be bought new๐Ÿ“‹ NEW items are explicit: sub-THz radios, spectrum licences, QKD key management
6Upgrade plans also scare teams into replacing everythingโ™ป๏ธ KEEP items are explicit too: fibre, SIM identities, the anchor band, the site
7Conversion tooling that runs unknown configs is a security hole๐Ÿงช sandbox-api chamber triage: static marker scan, data only, 0 executions, 0 network attempts
8Management interfaces of network gear get probed constantly๐Ÿฏ HoneypotX classifies and scores probes (top threat 100) from logs โ€” no live listener exposed
9AI advice in infra tools quietly becomes AI decisions๐Ÿง  Carbon 4 decides, Muse's authority is none in code, strictest outcome wins, live actions HOLD
10"Converter" tools overclaim a software upgrade for hardwareโš ๏ธ Every report carries physical_conversion_by_software_alone: false and modelled_not_measured: true

โ ๐Ÿ’ป How to install this? Step-by-step

Step 1 โ€” ๐Ÿ“ฅ Clone it

git clone https://github.com/credkellar/LTE-6G.git
cd LTE-6G

Step 2 โ€” ๐Ÿ Check Python (3.12 recommended; nothing to pip-install โ€” zero dependencies)

python3 --version

Step 3 โ€” ๐Ÿš€ Run the full demo

python main.py demo

Step 4 โ€” ๐Ÿ”€ Convert one LTE profile

python main.py convert lte
python main.py convert lte-advanced
python main.py convert-all

Step 5 โ€” ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ See the bearer โ†’ slice map, the chamber, and HoneypotX

python main.py slices
python main.py sandbox
python main.py honeypot

Step 6 โ€” โœ… Verify the build (expected: 12 passed and CHECKS 27/27)

pip install pytest
python -m pytest tests/ -q
python main.py checks
python main.py hold-demo   # expected: HOLD message, exit code 2

Step 7 โ€” ๐Ÿณ Or run it in Docker

docker build -t lte-6g .
docker run --rm lte-6g

Step 8 โ€” ๐Ÿ”„ (Owner only) Turn on CI + Docker Hub โ€” paste the two workflow-pack/ files under .github/workflows/ (plural folder, hand-typed names), add the DOCKERHUB_USERNAME / DOCKERHUB_TOKEN secrets, and the first Docker Publish run creates credkellar/lte-6g.


โ ๐Ÿ“‹ Requirements?

  • ๐Ÿ Python 3.12 (any 3.11+ should run it; CI tests 3.12)
  • ๐Ÿ“ฆ Zero pip dependencies for the tool itself โ€” Python standard library only
  • ๐Ÿงช pytest โ€” only if you want to run the test suite
  • ๐Ÿณ Docker โ€” optional, only for the container run / publish
  • ๐Ÿ”‘ No API keys required โ€” the council seats are offline and deterministic; GEMINI_API_KEY / MODEL_API_KEY are detected by name/presence only and are never read out, printed or stored (Muse usage on the real Meta Model API is pay-as-you-go, never free)
  • ๐Ÿ“ถ No radio hardware, no carrier account, no spectrum โ€” this is a model; anything live is HOLD-gated

โ ๐Ÿง’ Explain in 5th grade English

๐Ÿ“ถ Think of LTE like an old road with one narrow lane. Cars (your videos, games and messages) have to share it, so traffic is slow and nobody gets their own lane.

โšก 6G is like a huge new highway with many wide lanes, super fast cars, and special lanes โ€” one for ambulances, one for trucks, one for bikes.

๐Ÿ”€ This project is a converter machine. You tell it about your old road ("one lane, this wide, at this place"). It does the math โ€” real math that scientists use for radio waves โ€” and shows you the new highway you would get: how much faster, how much wider, and how much quicker.

๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ On the old road, all cars were just lined up by type. On the new highway, the converter gives each type its own special lane for the first time.

๐Ÿงช Before anything goes into the machine, it passes through a safety box that looks at it but never turns it on. A fake door (HoneypotX) writes down who knocks but never opens. And ๐Ÿง  two smart helpers check every plan: one decides, the other can only give tips.

โš ๏ธ The most important part: this machine is a model, like a model airplane. It shows you exactly what the real thing would be like, but a model cannot fly you anywhere. Building the real 6G highway needs real new towers, real new radios, and permission to use the new airwaves. Anyone who says a computer program alone can turn an LTE tower into a 6G tower is not telling the truth โ€” and this project will never say that.


โ ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Mermaid flowchart diagrams โ€” one per script

โ ๐ŸŽ›๏ธ main.py โ€” the one entry point
flowchart TD
    A[โŒจ๏ธ python main.py] --> B{Command?}
    B -->|demo| C[๐Ÿ”€ Convert both + security + council]
    B -->|convert| D[๐Ÿ“Š One profile report]
    B -->|slices| E[๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ QCI โ†’ slice map]
    B -->|sandbox| F[๐Ÿงช Chamber triage]
    B -->|honeypot| G[๐Ÿฏ HoneypotX summary]
    B -->|council| H[๐Ÿง  Carbon 4 + Muse]
    B -->|checks| I[โœ… Self-checks]
    B -->|hold-demo| J[โ›” HOLD gate, exit 2]
โ ๐Ÿ“ฆ lte6g/__init__.py โ€” the package map
flowchart LR
    A[๐Ÿ“ฆ lte6g package] --> B[๐Ÿงฎ link + profiles]
    A --> C[๐Ÿ”€ converter + slices]
    A --> D[๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ sandbox_api + payloads + honeypotx]
    A --> E[๐Ÿง  council + gates]
    A --> F[โœ… checks]
โ ๐Ÿงฎ lte6g/link.py โ€” shared Shannon + FSPL physics
flowchart LR
    A[๐Ÿ“ distance + frequency] --> B[๐Ÿ“‰ FSPL path loss]
    C[๐Ÿ“ก antenna count] --> D[๐ŸŽฏ beamforming gain]
    B --> E[๐Ÿ“ถ SNR at distance]
    D --> E
    E --> F[๐Ÿ“ Shannon efficiency, capped by QAM]
    F --> G[๐Ÿš€ capacity = BW ร— eff ร— streams ร— 1 โˆ’ overhead]
โ ๐Ÿ“ถ lte6g/profiles.py โ€” LTE sources + 6G layers
flowchart TD
    A[๐Ÿ“ถ LTE profiles] --> B[๐Ÿ“ป lte: B3 1.8 GHz, 20 MHz, 2 streams]
    A --> C[๐Ÿ“ป lte-advanced: B7 2.6 GHz, 100 MHz CA, 4 streams]
    D[โšก 6G layers] --> E[60 GHz ยท 2 GHz]
    D --> F[140 GHz ยท 10 GHz]
    D --> G[300 GHz ยท 12 GHz]
โ ๐Ÿ”€ lte6g/converter.py โ€” the conversion itself
flowchart TD
    A[๐Ÿ“ถ LTE LinkConfig] --> B[โš“ Keep band as anchor]
    B --> C[โž• Aggregate 60/140/300 GHz layers]
    C --> D[๐ŸŽš๏ธ Streams ร—4 cap 8 ยท antennas โ†’ 256 ยท 4096-QAM ยท overhead 15%]
    D --> E[๐Ÿ“Š Report: gain + distance sweep + honesty flags]
    D --> F[๐Ÿ“‹ Plan: KEEP / UPGRADE / NEW / HOLD]
โ ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ lte6g/slices.py โ€” bearers become slices
flowchart LR
    A[๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ QCI 1 voice] --> U[โšก URLLC++]
    B[๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ QCI 2/4/6/8/9 data + video] --> E[๐ŸŒ eMBB+]
    C[๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ QCI 3/5/7 gaming + signalling] --> U
    D[๐Ÿ“Ÿ LTE-M / NB-IoT] --> M[๐Ÿ”ข mMTC+]
    F[๐Ÿšซ nothing in LTE] --> Q[๐Ÿ” Q-SLICE - NEW]
โ ๐Ÿงช lte6g/sandbox_api.py โ€” the sandbox-api chamber (verbatim)
flowchart TD
    A[๐Ÿ“ฅ Sample arrives as DATA] --> B[๐Ÿ—„๏ธ Written to isolated temp dir]
    B --> C[๐Ÿ” Static analysis only]
    C --> D[๐Ÿ“Š Telemetry: bytes, trace, FS diff]
    D --> E[๐Ÿšซ network attempts = 0 ยท executed = false]
    E --> F[๐Ÿ“ค Report + telemetry out]
โ ๐ŸŽฏ lte6g/payloads.py โ€” conversion payload triage
flowchart LR
    A[๐ŸŽฏ 7 conversion payloads] --> B[๐Ÿ” Marker scan]
    B -->|clean: config, QCI map, plan, slice policy| C[โœ… 4 ALLOW_STATIC_STUDY]
    B -->|eval / socket / shell markers| D[โ›” 3 HOLD_IN_CHAMBER]
โ ๐Ÿฏ lte6g/honeypotx.py โ€” HoneypotX log analysis
flowchart TD
    A[๐Ÿ“œ 12 synthetic trap-log entries<br/>TEST-NET-3 IPs] --> B[๐Ÿท๏ธ Classify: scanner / env / LFI / SQLi / upload]
    B --> C[โš–๏ธ Threat score by class weight]
    C --> D[๐Ÿ’ฅ Burst bonus: 5 attempts from one IP]
    D --> E[๐Ÿ“Š Summary: top threat 100]
    E --> F[๐Ÿšช listener_open = false ยท access_granted = false]
โ ๐Ÿง  lte6g/council.py โ€” Carbon 4 + Muse
flowchart LR
    A[โ“ Request + risk] --> B[๐Ÿง  Carbon 4 DECIDER<br/>MAP โ†’ MODEL โ†’ STRESS โ†’ DECIDE]
    A --> C[๐Ÿ’ก Muse advisor<br/>exactly 4 advice ยท authority none]
    B --> D{โš–๏ธ Strictest wins}
    C --> D
    D --> E[โœ… ALLOW_SIM / โš ๏ธ REVIEW / โ›” HOLD]
โ โ›” lte6g/gates.py โ€” the 14 HOLD gates
flowchart LR
    A[โšก Action requested] --> B{๐Ÿท๏ธ On the HOLD list?}
    B -- Yes --> C[โ›” HoldGate raised<br/>Darion approves or it does not happen]
    B -- No --> D[โœ… Model / local work proceeds]
โ โœ… lte6g/checks.py โ€” self-checks
flowchart TD
    A[โœ… 27 checks] --> B[๐Ÿ”€ Conversion gains + anchor kept]
    A --> C[๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ All QCI mapped ยท Q-SLICE new]
    A --> D[๐Ÿงช Chamber 4/3 ยท never executes]
    A --> E[๐Ÿฏ HoneypotX 12 ยท top 100 ยท no listener]
    A --> F[๐Ÿง  Council holds live ยท allows sim]
    B --> G{๐Ÿ All pass?}
    C --> G
    D --> G
    E --> G
    F --> G
    G -- Yes --> H[๐Ÿšช Exit 0]
    G -- No --> I[๐Ÿšช Exit 1]
โ ๐Ÿงช tests/test_converter.py โ€” the test suite
flowchart LR
    A[๐Ÿงช pytest] --> B[๐Ÿ“ FSPL + Shannon caps]
    A --> C[๐Ÿ”€ Conversion gain + honesty flags]
    A --> D[๐Ÿงช Chamber + ๐Ÿฏ HoneypotX invariants]
    A --> E[โ›” Gates fire ยท ๐Ÿง  council verdicts]
    A --> F[โœ… checks.py all-pass test]

โ ๐ŸŒณ Project structure

LTE-6G/
โ”œโ”€โ”€ main.py                 # one entry point
โ”œโ”€โ”€ README.md ยท LICENSE ยท Dockerfile
โ”œโ”€โ”€ assets/cover.png        # cover (owner upload - binary)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ lte6g/                  # link ยท profiles ยท converter ยท slices
โ”‚                           # sandbox_api ยท payloads ยท honeypotx
โ”‚                           # council ยท gates ยท checks
โ”œโ”€โ”€ tests/test_converter.py # 12 tests
โ””โ”€โ”€ workflow-pack/          # ci.yml ยท docker-publish.yml (owner's paste)

โ โ›” HOLD gates (14)

GateWhat it stops
live_carrier_conversionConverting a live carrier network from LTE to 6G
live_subscriber_cutoverCutting live subscribers over to a converted cell
rf_spectrum_transmissionTransmitting on real RF / THz spectrum
spectrum_license_bypassBypassing spectrum licensing for the 6G layers
radio_firmware_flashingFlashing radio / baseband firmware to "make it 6G"
physical_6g_claimClaiming a physical 6G link exists where only a model ran
live_network_reconfigurationReconfiguring a live network
user_traffic_routingRouting real user traffic through the converter
core_network_migration_liveMigrating a live EPC core
satellite_uplinkTransmitting to a satellite as part of a conversion
safety_critical_controlSafety-critical control over a converted link
live_gemini_api_callCalling the live Gemini / Carbon 4 API with a real key
live_sample_detonationDetonating a live sample outside the chamber
live_honeypot_listenerOpening a live HoneypotX listener

โ ๐Ÿง  The council

  • ๐Ÿง  Gemini Carbon 4 Extended Thinking - DECIDER: model google/gemini-carbon-4-extended-pro-thinking, MAP โ†’ MODEL โ†’ STRESS โ†’ DECIDE, tiers 2048 / 8192 / 32768 (32768 default), offline, tighten-only, never overrides a HOLD gate; key detected by presence only.
  • ๐Ÿ’ก Muse - advisor: muse-spark-1.1 / muse-wonder-1.0, exactly 4 advice items, authority: none, key names-only (usage pay-as-you-go, never labelled free).
  • โš–๏ธ Rule: strictest wins - a live conversion request ends at HOLD.

โ โœ… Verified (v1.0.0, 2026-11-10)

  • ๐Ÿงช pytest 12 passed ยท โœ… checks 27/27 ยท ๐Ÿš€ demo exit 0 ยท โ›” hold-demo exit 2
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Modelled @100 m: lte ร—8,936.1 ยท lte-advanced ร—629.1 capacity gain
  • ๐Ÿงช Chamber: 7 โ†’ 4 allowed / 3 held, executed = false, network = 0; sandbox_api.py sha256 28b3365cโ€ฆ, identical to Q6G-1TB and MonadDB-RE
  • ๐Ÿฏ HoneypotX: 12 attempts, top threat 100, 1 burst, listener closed
  • ๐Ÿท๏ธ All shields badge URLs checked live โ†’ HTTP 200 (workflow badges static-pending until the owner's paste)
  • ๐Ÿณ Docker build not tested locally (no Docker on the build machine); Dockerfile = the Q6G-1TB slim pattern

โ ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป Author

Darion Kellar - engineer / open-source builder. LTE-6G is the on-ramp to Q6G-1TBโ : same physics, same council, same honesty rules. ๐Ÿ“œ MIT License - see LICENSE.

Tag summary

Content type

Image

Digest

sha256:8f29487b3โ€ฆ

Size

46.6 MB

Last updated

about 15 hours ago

docker pull credkellar/lte-6g