lenfenn/longform-memory-mcp repository overview

⁠longform-memory-mcp

Your AI writing assistant remembers chapter 3 when it writes chapter 300 — and the prompt never gets bigger.

Documentation and the numbers behind it →⁠

⁠Install

One line in your MCP config. No account, no key, no sign-up.

Claude Desktop — claude_desktop_config.json Cursor — ~/.cursor/mcp.json Windsurf, Cline, Zed, Continue — same shape

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "longform-memory": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "longform-memory-mcp"],
      "env": { "LONGFORM_MEMORY_PROJECT": "my-novel" }
    }
  }
}

Claude Code

claude mcp add longform-memory -e LONGFORM_MEMORY_PROJECT=my-novel -- npx -y longform-memory-mcp

Restart your client. Then say: "remember this chapter" and "recall context for chapter 12".

⁠The problem it solves

Write anything long with an LLM — a novel, a manual, a course, a serialised story — and you hit the same wall twice.

Withhold the past and it contradicts itself. A character who died in chapter 12 speaks in chapter 30. The key planted in chapter 3 is never mentioned again.

Send the past and you cannot afford it. Pasting every prior summary is O(n): tens of thousands of tokens by chapter 100, and by chapter 1000 it does not fit at all. Filling the window also makes things worse — models skip the middle.

Both are the same problem wearing two hats: there is no budget ceiling.

   memory in the prompt
         │
   61k  ─┤                                              ╭──── just paste it all
         │                                        ╭─────╯
   30k  ─┤                          ╭─────────────╯
         │            ╭─────────────╯
    4k  ─┤════════════╪═════════════╪═════════════╪════ longform-memory
         └──────┬─────┴──────┬──────┴──────┬──────┴────
               10           100           500        1000     chapter

Measured on a real 1000-chapter book: 61,331 tokens → 4,396, and going from chapter 500 to chapter 1000 grew the block by 2 tokens.

⁠The six tools

⁠The rhythm

   ┌─ recall_context(12) ──────► paste into your drafting context
   │
   ├─ list_open_threads(12) ───► what's still owed
   │
   ├─ …write chapter 12…
   │
   └─ remember_chapter(12, …) ─► summary · entity states · thread moves

Step four is where the value is made. Your assistant is the model doing the extraction — it just read the chapter, so it already knows what changed.

⁠It never calls a model

This server has no LLM inside it. The client calling it already is one.

So remember_chapter does not run an extraction pass over your prose — it asks your assistant to hand over what it understood while reading. That single decision is why there is:

• no API key to obtain, paste, rotate or leak
• no account, no sign-up, no rate limit
• no cost to anyone, at any usage level
• no network call, ever

⁠Privacy

Everything lives in plain files under ~/.longform-memory/<project>/:

~/.longform-memory/my-novel/
├── events.jsonl        # append-only: summaries, entity states, threads
└── chapters/
    ├── 000001.txt      # your prose, only if you passed `text`
    └── 000002.txt

Readable, greppable, rm-able, and yours. No telemetry. The only outbound request this package can ever make is to an embedding endpoint you configure yourself — and if you configure none, the code path never runs.

Why an append-only log rather than SQLite: this server is launched by npx inside someone else's editor, and a native module that fails to build there is not a degraded experience — it is a server that never starts, and you would never find out why.

⁠Configuration

All three embedding variables must be set together — a half-configured endpoint that quietly does nothing is worse than no feature. search_memory always states which mode actually ran.

⁠What it deliberately does not do

• No semantic contradiction detection. "Three towers in chapter 4, four in chapter 60" needs a reader. A detector guessing at that produces a panel full of false alarms, and a panel that cries wolf is a panel nobody reads. check_continuity covers the part a model is bad at — remembering exactly, across a thousand chapters.
• No writing. It does not generate, rewrite or critique prose.
• No cloud sync. One machine, one directory.
• No automatic extraction. If your client does not send entity states and threads, you get summary storage — and the reply tells you so rather than pretending.

⁠Use it as a library

The server is a thin adapter; everything is callable directly.

import { recallContext, rememberChapter } from 'longform-memory-mcp';

await rememberChapter({
  project: 'my-novel',
  chapter: 12,
  summary: 'Ines burns the letter and lies to her brother about it.',
  entities: [{ name: 'Ines', state: 'lying to Tomas', note: 'first outright lie' }],
  threads: [{ summary: 'what the letter actually said', deadlineChapter: 30 }],
});

const { recall } = await recallContext({ project: 'my-novel', chapter: 13 });
console.log(recall.text);       // paste-ready block
console.log(recall.sections);   // { entity: { usedTokens, kept, dropped }, … }

The budgeting core is published separately, with no dependencies at all: longform-memory⁠ (npm) · longform-memory⁠ (PyPI).

⁠Development

npm install
npm test          # 54 tests, including a real stdio protocol round-trip
npm run build

The test suite spawns the built binary and speaks JSON-RPC to it, because the failures that only appear there are the expensive ones — a non-executable bin, a schema the SDK rejects, a stray write to stdout corrupting the transport.

⁠License

MIT © Emberspun. Built for Emberspun, an AI book writer for self-publishers⁠ — this memory layer runs there on every chapter.

⁠Claude Skill

Tool descriptions tell a model what a call returns. They cannot tell it that recalling after drafting is useless, or that a [T3] from one chapter must not be quoted at another. That is sequencing and judgement, and it lives in a skill:

emberspun/longform-memory-skill⁠

git clone https://github.com/emberspun/longform-memory-skill.git \
  ~/.claude/skills/longform-writing

Kept in its own repository so there is exactly one copy — the same text in two places drifts, and the stale one is the one somebody reads.